Return to Article Details Role Of Core Needle Biopsy in The Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Literature Review Download Download PDF

Validation errors:

Failed to locate the main schema resource at 'https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.3.6.xsd'.

Invalid XML:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" version="4.3.6" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.3.6.xsd">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>_1775644647</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>1775644647</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>Talat Waseem</depositor_name>
      <email_address>TWASEEM@GMAIL.COM</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>Pakistan Endocrine &amp; Thyroid Surgeons Association (PETSA) &amp; Dr Talat Waseem FRCS Eng)</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata>
        <full_title>Archives of Surgical Research</full_title>
        <abbrev_title>ArchSurgRes</abbrev_title>
        <issn media_type="electronic">2709-6858</issn>
        <issn media_type="print">2709-684X</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>07</month>
          <day>24</day>
          <year>2022</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>3</volume>
        </journal_volume>
        <issue>2</issue>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.48111/2022.Vol-03.Issue-02</doi>
          <resource>https://archivessr.com/index.php/asr/issue/view/11</resource>
        </doi_data>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" publication_type="full_text" metadata_distribution_opts="any">
        <titles>
          <title>Proficiency-Based Progression Training: Key To Effective Clinical Procedural Teaching? </title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first" language="en">
            <given_name>Hamza</given_name>
            <surname>Azhar</surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional" language="en">
            <given_name>Ehtisham Sohail</given_name>
            <surname>Khan </surname>
          </person_name>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional" language="en">
            <given_name>Talat</given_name>
            <surname>Waseem</surname>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1">
          <jats:p>IMPORTANCE Proficiency-Based Progression (PBP) training is a form of training in which the trainee has to achieve a benchmark that has been quantitatively defined.  This is contrary to conventional training where progression benchmarks are arbitrary, This form of training may find its place in surgery and procedural medicine with some studies finding it to be effective while others claim to have seen no impact on trainees.
METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and Cochrane library and 15 eligible RCTs were extracted in which proficiency-based progression (PBP) training was compared with traditional surgical training methods.  
RESULT 15 RCTs were included (412 participants from all RCTs). The PBP group demonstrated a reduced number of procedural errors as compared to the non-PBP group (Weighted Mean Difference: —6.14 errors, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) —8.63 to —3.65, p  &lt; 0.00001), as well as a reduction in procedural time in the PBP group as compared to the non-PBP group (Weighted Mean Difference: —5.46, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) —8.56 to —2.37, p = 0.0005) but the non-PBP group performed more procedural steps than the PBP group (Weighted Mean Difference: 2.18, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) —1.31 to 5.66, p &lt; 0.00001).
CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis shows that PBP-trained groups outperform their traditional counterparts by completing procedures quicker and making fewer errors. This model of training may be an effective training tool for the future.</jats:p>
        </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <month>06</month>
          <day>30</day>
          <year>2022</year>
        </publication_date>
        <pages>
          <first_page>4</first_page>
          <last_page>10</last_page>
        </pages>
        <ai:program xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators">
          <ai:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ai:license_ref>
        </ai:program>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.48111/2022.02.02</doi>
          <resource>https://archivessr.com/index.php/asr/article/view/167</resource>
          <collection property="crawler-based">
            <item crawler="iParadigms">
              <resource>https://archivessr.com/index.php/asr/article/download/167/268</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
          <collection property="text-mining">
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://archivessr.com/index.php/asr/article/download/167/268</resource>
            </item>
            <item>
              <resource mime_type="text/xml">https://archivessr.com/index.php/asr/article/download/167/276</resource>
            </item>
          </collection>
        </doi_data>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>

Could not convert selected objects.